Sign In
 [New User? Sign Up]
Mobile Version

Snohomish County Planning Display

  • Email Friend
  • Save Ad
  • QR Code
Category: Events and Notices - Legal and Public Notices
Posted: 03/15/2017





Publication Date: March 15, 2017


Call the planner assigned to the project.

Review project file at Snohomish County Planning and Development Services (PDS)


• *NEW *PermitCenterand Record Center Hours are



8:00 a.m. to Noon & 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Mon, Tues, Wed and Fri


10:00 a.m. to Noon & 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Thurs


Please call ahead to be certain the project file is available.


Please Note: submittals of projects are now taken by appointment only

To comment on a project:


Submit written comments to PDS at the address below. All comments received prior to

issuance of a department decision or recommendation will be reviewed. To ensure that

comments are addressed in the decision or recommendation, they should be received by PDS

before the end of the published comment period.

Comments, on a project scheduled for a hearing before the hearing examiner, may be made by

submitting them to PDS prior to the open record hearing.

PDS only publishes the decisions as required by Snohomish County Code. Persons will receive

notice of all decisions that they have submitted written comment on, regardless of whether or

not they are published.

You may become a party of record for a project by: 1. submitting original written comments and

request to become a party of record to the county prior to the hearing, 2. testifying at the

hearing or 3. entering your name on a sign-up register at the hearing. NOTE: only parties of

record may subsequently appeal the hearing examiner’s decision or provide written or oral

arguments to the county council if such an appeal is filed.

To appeal a decision:


Department decisions (including SEPA threshold determinations): submit a written appeal and

the $500 filing fee to PDS prior to the close of the appeal period. Refer to SCC 30.71.050(5) for

details on what must be included in a written appeal.

A SEPA appeal also requires that an affidavit or declaration be filed with the hearing examiner

within seven days of filing the appeal, pursuant to SCC 30.61.305(1).

Hearing examiner decisions issued after a public hearing are appealable as described in the

examiner’s decision. Notice of those decisions is not published. You must have submitted

written comments to PDS or written or oral comments at the public hearing in order to appeal

a hearing examiner’s decision.

Building and Grading applications associated with a Single Family Residence are not subject

to the County’s appeal process. To file a judicial appeal in Superior Court, refer to

WAC 197-11-680 and RCW 43.21C.075.

How to Reach Us:


TheCustomerServiceCenterfor the Snohomish County Planning and Development Services is

located on the 2nd floor of theRobertJ.DrewelBuildingat3000 Rockefeller Avenue,Everett.


Planning and Development Services





3000 Rockefeller Avenue, M/S 604


Phone: 425-388-3311 TTY

FAX: 425-388-3872


ADANOTICE:SnohomishCountyfacilities are accessible. Accommodations for persons with

disabilities will be provided upon advance request. Please make arrangements one week prior to

hearing by calling the Hearing Examiner’s office, 425-388-3538 voice, or contact (PDS) at 425-3887119

voice, or 388-3700 TDD



File Name: Tim & Beverly Acker File Number: 17 103720 LDA, 17 103717 AB, 17 103719 FZ

Project Description: Clearing & Grading for 150 linear feet Cable Lift (Tram) onPuget Sound.

Location: 16818 MARINE DR STANWOOD

Tax Account #: 003945-070-007-00

Applicant: Tim & Beverly Acker

Date of Application/Completeness Date: March 10, 2017

SEPA review: The department has determined that this proposal is not likely to result in any significant

adverse environmental impact, and that issuance of a DNS is likely following the comment period for this

notice. The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used for this proposal and includes the



1) This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal.

2) The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the project review

process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared.


3) A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for this proposal may be obtained upon request.

Approvals required: Building Permit, Flood Hazard Permit & Land Disturbing Activity Permit

Comment Period: Submit written comments on or before April 5, 2017

Project Manager: Kirk Prindle, 425.262.2006

Project Manager e-mail: EDH748092




File Name:Central ParkFile Number: 17 101172 PA

Description of Proposal: The applicant submitted a request for the approval of a pre-application

concurrency evaluation of a proposed 172 townhouse development under Snohomish County Code

Chapter 30.66B.175. The evaluation was limited to a determination of whether or not sufficient capacity

will exist on county arterials to accommodate the number of new peak hour trips shown below from the

location shown below without causing the level of service (LOS) on any County arterials to reach a level of

congestion that is worse than the standard adopted bySnohomishCountyin its comprehensive plan. No

other aspects of transportation impacts were reviewed at this time.

Location: The proposed development is located on the east side of35th Ave SEat 193xx,Bothell,WAin

Section 16, Township 27 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,Snohomish County,Washington.

Tax Account Number: 270516-003-022-00, 270516-003-025-00

Applicant: Raelyn Hulquist - DR Horton

Number of Peak Hour Trips: Maximum of 74.90 new AM peak-hour trips and 89.44 new PM peak-hour trips

Date of application/Completeness date: Thursday January 26, 2017

Pre-Application Concurrency Decision: The concurrency evaluation was made bySnohomishCounty

Planning and Development Services Traffic/Drainage Section and Snohomish County Public Works based

on the written proposal and traffic analysis dated January 26, 2017, submitted by the applicant’s consultant,

Gibson Traffic Consultants.SnohomishCounty, pursuant to SCC

30.66B.035 and SCC 30.66B.130(4).

Lead Agency: Snohomish County Planning & Development Services

SEPA Decision: On March 9, 2017, PDS determined that the projected number of new peak-hour trips

would not have a probable, significant adverse impact on the transportation level of service on County

arterials and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on March 15, 2017. An environmental

impact statement (EIS) under RCW 43.21C.03(2)(c) is not required. This decision was made after review

of a completed environmental checklist and other information submitted by the applicant.

SEPA Comment Period: Comments must be received by March 29, 2017, 14 days from the date of

publication of this notice.

SEPA Appeal Period: This DNS and the administrative decisions may be appealed pursuant to the

requirements of Sections 30.61.300, and Chapter 2.02 SCC. The fourteen (14) day appeal period

commences on the date of publication of notice. Any appeal must be addressed to theCountyHearing

Examiner, accompanied by a filing fee of $500.00, and be filed in writing at theCustomerSupportCenter

on the 2nd Floor,CountyAdministrationBuildingEast,Everett,WA. The appeal must be received by March

29, 2017. The appeal must contain the items set forth in 30.71.050(5) SCC as follows:


(a) Facts demonstrating that the person is aggrieved by the decision;

(b) A concise statement identifying each alleged inadequacy in the threshold determination;

(c) The specific relief requested; and

(d) Any other information reasonably necessary to make a decision on appeal.


Please note that failure to file a timely and complete appeal including all the above items shall constitute

waiver of all rights to an administrative appeal under county code. In addition to the above requirements,

SCC 30.61.305(1) also requires that any person filing an appeal of a threshold determination made

pursuant to this chapter shall file with the hearing examiner, within seven days of filing the appeal, a

sworn affidavit or declaration demonstrating facts and evidence, that, if proven, would demonstrate that the

issuance of the threshold determination was clearly erroneous.

Transportation Development Review (TDR): Mark Brown, 425.262.2024

TDR e-mail: EDH748100





See PDF at:

Contact Seller

* required information
Powered By Adicio